HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Anderson, A. F. Articles by Lipscomb, A. B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Anderson, A. F. Articles by Lipscomb, A. B., Sr.

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using the Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendons Augmented by the Losee Iliotibial Band Tenodesis

A Long-term Study

Lipscomb Clinic, Nashville, Tennessee

Robert B. Snyder, MD

Lipscomb Clinic, Nashville, Tennessee

A. Brant Lipscomb, Sr., MD

Lipscomb Clinic, Nashville, Tennessee

Seventy patients were evaluated after combined intra- and extraarticular reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Semitendinosus and gracilis tendons were used for the intraarticular reconstruction and Losee iliotibial band tenodesis for the extraarticular procedure. Minimum followup was 5 years (average, 7). Clinical examination and instrumented ligament examination with the KT-1000 arthrometer and the Cybex II dyna mometer were used to evaluate results. Subjectively, patients had no complaints of instability with daily ac tivities ; 93% had no complaints of instability with athletic participation. Clinical examination demonstrated that 81 % had less than a 1 + Lachman test; 98% had a nega tive pivot shift. Instrumented examination of the antero posterior limits of motion revealed that only 57% had less than 3-mm side-to-side difference; 30% had 3- to 5-mm; and 13% had 6- to 9-mm. Mean hamstring muscle strength measured with the Cybex II dynamom eter was 94% at 60 and 96% at 100 deg/sec. When evaluated with the Zarins scale, 90% were rated good or excellent, 6% fair, and 4% poor. This reconstructive procedure restores functional, but not necessarily nor mal, stability in most anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees. It allows patients to increase activity levels with out significant risk of additional injuries.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. L. Keays, J. E. Bullock-Saxton, A. C. Keays, P. A. Newcombe, and M. I. Bullock A 6-Year Follow-up of the Effect of Graft Site on Strength, Stability, Range of Motion, Function, and Joint Degeneration After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Patellar Tendon Versus Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Graft Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2007; 35(5): 729 - 739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. D. Beynnon, R. J. Johnson, J. A. Abate, B. C. Fleming, and C. E. Nichols Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, Part I Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2005; 33(10): 1579 - 1602. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. P. Spindler, T. A. Warren, J. C. Callison Jr., M. Secic, S. B. Fleisch, and R. W. Wright Clinical Outcome at a Minimum of Five Years After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2005; 87(8): 1673 - 1679. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Honl, V. Carrero, E. Hille, E. Schneider, and M. M. Morlock Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Grafts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An in Vitro Comparison of Mechanical Behavior under Failure Tensile Loading and Cyclic Submaximal Tensile Loading Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2002; 30(4): 549 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. F. Anderson, R. B. Snyder, and A. B. Lipscomb Jr Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Randomized Study of Three Surgical Methods Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2001; 29(3): 272 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. H. Fu, C. H. Bennett, C. B. Ma, J. Menetrey, and C. Lattermann Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part II. Operative Procedures and Clinical Correlations Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2000; 28(1): 124 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. F. Draganich, Y.-F. Hsieh, S. Ho, and B. Reider Intraarticular Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Placement on the Average Most Isometric Line on the Femur: Does It Reproducibly Restore Knee Kinematics? Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 1999; 27(3): 329 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. R. Bach Jr, M. E. Levy, J. Bojchuk, S. Tradonsky, C. A. Bush-Joseph, and N. H. Khan Single-Incision Endoscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Autograft: Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up Evaluation Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1998; 26(1): 30 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. B. FRANK and D. W. JACKSON Current Concepts Review - The Science of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1997; 79(10): 1556 - 76. [Full Text]

				M. Samuelson, L. F. Draganich, Xiadong Zhou, P. Krumins, and B. Reider The Effects of Knee Reconstruction on Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Capsular Deficiencies Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1996; 24(4): 492 - 497. [Abstract] [PDF]