AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shelbourne, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shelbourne, K. D.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, G. E.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 21:779-782 (1993)
© 1993 SAGE Publications

Locked bucket-handle meniscal tears in knees with chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency

K. Donald Shelbourne, MD

Methodist Sports Medicine Center, Indianapolis, Indiana

Glen E. Johnson, MD

Methodist Sports Medicine Center, Indianapolis, Indiana

Because we noticed patients had difficulty regaining full range of motion after surgery for a locked bucket- handle meniscal tear with simultaneous reconstruction for a chronic anterior cruciate ligament tear, we adopted a two-stage procedure for this group of patients. We evaluated the results of a two-stage procedure in the knees of 16 athletes (Group 1) and compared their outcome with the outcome of 16 matched athletes who had been treated with simultaneous repair or removal of the displaced bucket-handle meniscal tear and au togenous patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament re construction (Group 2). Four patients in Group 2 re quired a second procedure or casting to regain full extension. No patient in Group 1 required a second procedure. One meniscal retear was detected in Group 1. The two-stage procedure also appears to have a number of theoretical advantages: 1) more aggressive use of repair rather than removal of a displaced torn meniscus, 2) prevention of problems in regaining range of motion, 3) allows a second look to judge the success of meniscal repair, and 4) allows time for the patient to prepare for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction physically, mentally, academically, and socially.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. J. O'Shea and K. D. Shelbourne
Repair of Locked Bucket-Handle Meniscal Tears in Knees with Chronic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2003; 31(2): 216 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
P. E. Greis, M. C. Holmstrom, D. D. Bardana, and R. T. Burks
Meniscal Injury: II. Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2002; 10(3): 177 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. D. Shelbourne and T. Gray
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Autogenous Patellar Tendon Graft Followed by Accelerated Rehabilitation: A Two- to Nine-Year Followup
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1997; 25(6): 786 - 795.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. D. Shelbourne and R. V. Trumper
Preventing Anterior Knee Pain After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1997; 25(1): 41 - 47.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.