AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pink, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jobe, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pink, M.
Right arrow Articles by Jobe, F. W.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 21:385-388 (1993)
© 1993 SAGE Publications

Electromyographic analysis of the trunk in golfers

Marilyn Pink, MS, PT

Biomechanics Laboratory, Centinela Hospital Medical Center, Inglewood, California

Jacquelin Perry, MD

Biomechanics Laboratory, Centinela Hospital Medical Center, Inglewood, California

Frank W. Jobe, MD

Biomechanics Laboratory, Centinela Hospital Medical Center, Inglewood, California

Golf is a popular sport for both men and women. The trunk is the most common area of injury during the golf swing. The purpose of this study was to describe and compare the muscle firing patterns in the trunk during the golf swing. Twenty-three golfers with handicaps of five or below volunteered for this study. Surface elec tromyographic electrodes were placed on the abdomi nal oblique and erector spinae muscles bilaterally. High- speed cinematography was used in conjunction with the electromyographic electrodes. The results demon strated relatively low activity in all muscles during tak eaway (below 30% of maximal muscle test), and rela tively high and constant activity throughout the rest of the swing (above 30% maximal muscle test, with the exception of the contralateral erector spinae during late follow-through, which was 28% maximal muscle test). This high and constant activity demonstrated the im portance of the trunk muscles during a golf swing. These results indicate the need for an effective preven tive and rehabilitative exercise program for the golfer.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
A McHardy, H Pollard, and P J Garbutt
Muscle activity during the golf swing * Commentary
Br. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2005; 39(11): 799 - 804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
A J Fradkin, C A Sherman, and C F Finch
Improving golf performance with a warm up conditioning programme
Br. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2004; 38(6): 762 - 765.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. Burdorf, G. A. Van Der Steenhoven, and E. G. M. Tromp-Klaren
A One-Year Prospective Study on Back Pain Among Novice Golfers
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1996; 24(5): 659 - 664.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. T. Kao, M. Pink, F. W. Jobe, and J. Perry
Electromyographic Analysis of the Scapular Muscles During a Golf Swing
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1995; 23(1): 19 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.