|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
Indiana University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Methodist Sports Medicine Center
Indiana University Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
Methodist Hospital Department of Pathology, Indianapolis, Indiana
To evaluate the fate of patellar tendon autografts in humans, the knees of 23 patients who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction were exam ined 3 weeks to 6.5 years postoperatively. Arthroscopy and biopsy were performed on all patients.
The patellar tendon autografts progressed through four stages of ligamentization after reconstruction. The first stage of repopulation occurred during the first 2 months and was evidenced by a viable 3-week speci men with an increasing fibroblast number and active nuclear morphology. Over the next 10 months, the graft went through a stage of rapid remodeling in which the fibroblast count increased markedly, the active nuclear morphology and neovascularity remained increased, and more areas of degeneration were present as the percentage of mature collagen decreased. The third stage or "maturation" stage occurred over the next 2 years and was characterized by a slow decline in the nuclei and the maturation of the collagen matrix. By 3 years the grafts were ligamentous by all histologic criteria examined.
The authors conclude that human autogenous patel lar tendon grafts are viable as early as 3 weeks post operatively and may not go through a necrotic stage. They then progress through a prolonged process of ligamentization that takes as long as 3 years to com plete.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Denti, D. L. Vetere, C. Bait, H. Schonhuber, G. Melegati, and P. Volpi Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Causes of Failure, Surgical Technique, and Clinical Results Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2008; 36(10): 1896 - 1902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Marumo, M. Saito, T. Yamagishi, and K. Fujii The "Ligamentization" Process in Human Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Autogenous Patellar and Hamstring Tendons: A Biochemical Study Am. J. Sports Med., August 1, 2005; 33(8): 1166 - 1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Deehan and T. E. Cawston The biology of integration of the anterior cruciate ligament J Bone Joint Surg Br, July 1, 2005; 87-B(7): 889 - 895. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Nomura, M Inoue, and H Sugiura Ultrastructural study of the extra-articular Leeds-Keio ligament prosthesis J. Clin. Pathol., June 1, 2005; 58(6): 665 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Delay, B. E. McGrath, and E. R. Mindell Observations on a Retrieved Patellar Tendon Autograft Used to Reconstruct the Anterior Cruciate Ligament : A Case Report J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 9, 2002; 84(8): 1433 - 1438. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jari and K. D. Shelbourne Staged Bilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Use of Contralateral Patellar Tendon Autograft: A Case Report Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2002; 30(3): 437 - 440. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Ishibashi, S. Toh, Y. Okamura, T. Sasaki, and T. Kusumi Graft Incorporation within the Tibial Bone Tunnel after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2001; 29(4): 473 - 479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. K. Goradia, M. C. Rochat, M. Kida, and W. A. Grana Natural History of a Hamstring Tendon Autograft Used for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Sheep Model Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2000; 28(1): 40 - 46. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Shelbourne and T. J. Davis Evaluation of Knee Stability Before and After Participation in a Functional Sports Agility Program During Rehabilitation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1999; 27(2): 156 - 161. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Shelbourne and T. Gray Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Autogenous Patellar Tendon Graft Followed by Accelerated Rehabilitation: A Two- to Nine-Year Followup Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1997; 25(6): 786 - 795. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. FRANK and D. W. JACKSON Current Concepts Review - The Science of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1997; 79(10): 1556 - 76. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tohyama, B. D. Beynnon, R. J. Johnson, P. A. Renstrom, and S. W. Arms The Effect of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Elongation at the Time of Implantation on the Biomechanical Behavior of the Graft and Knee Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1996; 24(5): 608 - 614. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Shelbourne and D. A. Foulk Timing of Surgery in Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears on the Return of Quadriceps Muscle Strength After Reconstruction Using an Autogenous Patellar Tendon Graft Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1995; 23(6): 686 - 689. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Shelbourne, T. E. Klootwyk, J. H. Wilckens, and M. S. De Carlo Ligament Stability Two to Six Years After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Autogenous Patellar Tendon Graft and Participation in Accelerated Rehabilitation Program Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1995; 23(5): 575 - 579. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |