AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paessler, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dahners, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Paessler, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Dahners, L. E.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 20:667-674 (1992)
© 1992 SAGE Publications

Augmented repair and early mobilization of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries

Hans H. Paessler, MD

Department of Traumatology, Kreiskrankenhaus, Bopfingen, Germany

Jörn Deneke, MD

Department of Traumatology, Kreiskrankenhaus, Bopfingen, Germany

Laurence E. Dahners, MD

Division of Orthopaedics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

This paper describes a technique for repair of the anterior cruciate ligament with protection of that repair by a synthetic augmentation device. Of 61 patients who underwent surgery 24 to 57 months (mean, 38.3) be fore data accumulation, 57 returned for followup. Sub jectively, 53 (93%) patients reported a good or excellent functional result; however, only 29 (51 %) of the patients returned to their preinjury sports level. Objectively, a radiographic Lachman test was performed on both the injured and the noninjured knee of all 57 patients. The preoperative mean difference between the knees was 8.6 mm (range, 4.6 to 17.2) and at followup it was 2.4 mm (range, -0.9 to 11.8). Radiographic abduction and adduction stress tests demonstrated stable healing of the (unrepaired) collateral ligament lesions (varus stress = 0.1 mm and valgus stress = 0.4 mm mean side-to- side difference), indicating that suturing of ruptured collateral ligaments is not necessary when the knee is centrally stabilized with the augmentation device. These results indicate that successful repair of the anterior cruciate ligament is frequently possible when enhanced with an augmentation device.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. Otto, L. A. Pinczewski, A. Clingeleffer, and R. Odell
Five-Year Results of Single-Incision Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Patellar Tendon Autograft
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1998; 26(2): 181 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. R. Bach JR, G. T. Jones, F. A. Sweet, and C. A. Hager
Arthroscopy-assisted Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patellar Tendon Substitution: Two- to Four-year Follow-up Results
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1994; 22(6): 758 - 767.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.