AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Silvino, N. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Jackson, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Silvino, N. J.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 20:644-656 (1992)
© 1992 SAGE Publications

Meniscal transplantation using fresh and cryopreserved allografts

An experimental study in goats

Douglas W. Jackson, MD

Southern California Center for Sports Medicine and Memorial Medical Center of Long Beach, Long Beach, California

Cahir A. McDevitt, PhD

Department of Musculoskeletal Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation Research Institute, Cleveland, Ohio

Timothy M. Simon, MS

Southern California Center for Sports Medicine and Memorial Medical Center of Long Beach, Long Beach, California

Steven P. Arnoczky, DVM

Laboratory of Comparative Orthopaedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York

E. Allan Atwell, MD

Southern California Center for Sports Medicine and Memorial Medical Center of Long Beach, Long Beach, California

Nicholas J. Silvino, MD

Southern California Center for Sports Medicine and Memorial Medical Center of Long Beach, Long Beach, California

A comparative study of three subgroups of meniscal transplants was undertaken in the goat model: Group 1 (autograft) involved removal and immediate reimplan tation of the meniscus; Group 2, fresh meniscal allo grafts ; and Group 3, cryopreserved (30 days) meniscal allografts. Six months after surgery, tissues were eval uated for gross degenerative changes, proteoglycan concentration (as assessed by uronic acid), water con tent, vascularity, histology, and cell viability. The con tralateral knee served as control for all comparisons. There was no statistical difference in the amount of arthritis present and all transplants demonstrated an essentially normal peripheral vascularity compared to controls. Sections revealed reduced numbers of cells in the central portions of the transplanted menisci and these viable cells demonstrated different behavior in multiplication in tissue culture compared to contralateral controls.

Grossly and microscopically, the implanted menisci differed little from the controls. The measurement of proteoglycan concentration and water content of the transplanted meniscal cartilage suggest alterations that may affect the long-term mechanical properties. The autograft specimens showed the water content was very slightly increased (3% to 6%), while the proteogly can concentration was increased (42% in terms of uronic acid). In contrast, the water content of the fresh allograft group and the cryopreserved group was in creased 12% to 24%. Proteoglycan concentration in these groups was decreased up to 56% in portions of some menisci compared to controls.

Fresh and cryopreserved meniscal allografts showed peripheral healing, revascularization, cellularity, and in corporation, and grossly appeared good at 6 months in the goat model. The biochemical changes in the extra cellular matrix at 6 months raises questions on the long- term function of these transplanted menisci.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. von Lewinski, D. Kohn, C. J. Wirth, and D. Lazovic
The Influence of Nonanatomical Insertion and Incongruence of Meniscal Transplants on the Articular Cartilage in an Ovine Model
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2008; 36(5): 841 - 850.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. Schimizzi, M. Wedemeyer, T. Odell, W. Thomas, A. T. Mahar, and R. Pedowitz
Effects of a Novel Sterilization Process on Soft Tissue Mechanical Properties for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Allografts
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2007; 35(4): 612 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. T. Kelly, H. G. Potter, X.-H. Deng, A. D. Pearle, A. S. Turner, R. F. Warren, and S. A. Rodeo
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation in the Sheep Knee: Evaluation of Chondroprotective Effects
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2006; 34(9): 1464 - 1477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
J. K. Sekiya and C. I. Ellingson
Meniscal allograft transplantation.
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2006; 14(3): 164 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. von Lewinski, T. Pressel, C. Hurschler, and F. Witte
The Influence of Intraoperative Pretensioning on the Chondroprotective Effect of Meniscal Transplants
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2006; 34(3): 397 - 406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
F. R. Noyes, S. D. Barber-Westin, and M. Rankin
Meniscal Transplantation in Symptomatic Patients Less Than Fifty Years Old
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 2004; 86(7): 1392 - 1404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. J. Cole, T. R. Carter, and S. A. Rodeo
Allograft Meniscal Transplantation : Background, Techniques, and Results
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 9, 2002; 84(7): 1236 - 1250.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
P. E. Greis, M. C. Holmstrom, D. D. Bardana, and R. T. Burks
Meniscal Injury: II. Management
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., May 1, 2002; 10(3): 177 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
E. Rath, J. C. Richmond, W. Yassir, J. D. Albright, and F. Gundogan
Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: Two- to Eight-Year Results
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2001; 29(4): 410 - 414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
Z. L. SZOMOR, T. E. MARTIN, F. BONAR, and G. A. C. MURRELL
The Protective Effects of Meniscal Transplantation on Cartilage. An Experimental Study in Sheep
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., January 1, 2000; 82(1): 80 - 8.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. M. Alhalki, S. M. Howell, and M. L. Hull
How Three Methods for Fixing a Medial Meniscal Autograft Affect Tibial Contact Mechanics
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 1999; 27(3): 320 - 328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. R. STONE, J. R. STEADMAN, W. G. RODKEY, and S.-T. LI
Regeneration of Meniscal Cartilage with Use of a Collagen Scaffold. Analysis of Preliminary Data
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., December 1, 1997; 79(12): 1770 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. J. Edwards, S. L. Whittle, M. J. Nissen, B. Cohen, R. D. Oakeshott, and G. C. R. Keene
Radiographic Changes in the Knee After Meniscal Transplantation: An Experimental Study in a Sheep Model
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1996; 24(2): 222 - 226.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. W. Jackson, J. Whelan, and T. M. Simon
Cell survival after transplantation of fresh meniscal allografts: DNA probe analysis in a goat model
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1993; 21(4): 540 - 550.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.