AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodland, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Francis, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Woodland, L. H.
Right arrow Articles by Francis, R. S.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 20:208-211 (1992)
© 1992 SAGE Publications

Parameters and comparisons of the quadriceps angle of college-aged men and women in the supine and standing positions

Lynn H. Woodland, MS, PT

Human Performance Laboratory, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah

Rulon S. Francis, PhD, PT

Human Performance Laboratory, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah

The purpose of this study was to determine normal, mean quadriceps angles (Q angles) for college-aged men and women, and to compare Q angles measured in the supine and the standing positions. The Q angles of 269 men and 257 women were measured in both positions by use of a specially modified goniometer. The mean Q angle for men was 12.7° in the supine position and 13.6° in the standing position; for women the mean Q angle was 15.8° in the supine position and 17.0° in the standing position. All of these differences were statistically significant. We calculated the inci dence of an abnormally high Q angle, and will discuss the implications of our findings.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
E. A. Rankin, M. Bostrom, W. Hozack, J. J. Jacobs, J. C. McCarthy, M. I. O'Connor, S. B. Trippel, and C. Turkelson
Gender-Specific Knee Replacements: A Technology Overview
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., February 1, 2008; 16(2): 63 - 67.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Orthop SurgHome page
S. Conley, A. Rosenberg, and R. Crowninshield
The Female Knee: Anatomic Variations
J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., September 1, 2007; 15(suppl_1): S31 - S36.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. Kaila
Influence of Modern Studded and Bladed Soccer Boots and Sidestep Cutting on Knee Loading During Match Play Conditions
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2007; 35(9): 1528 - 1536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. J. Rauh, T. D. Koepsell, F. P. Rivara, A. J. Margherita, and S. G. Rice
Epidemiology of Musculoskeletal Injuries among High School Cross-Country Runners
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 15, 2006; 163(2): 151 - 159.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
R. P. Grelsamer, A. Dubey, and C. H. Weinstein
Men and women have similar Q angles: A CLINICAL AND TRIGONOMETRIC EVALUATION
J Bone Joint Surg Br, November 1, 2005; 87-B(11): 1498 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
N. Chandrashekar, J. Slauterbeck, and J. Hashemi
Sex-Based Differences in the Anthropometric Characteristics of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Its Relation to Intercondylar Notch Geometry: A Cadaveric Study
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2005; 33(10): 1492 - 1498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. D. Chappell, B. Yu, D. T. Kirkendall, and W. E. Garrett
A Comparison of Knee Kinetics between Male and Female Recreational Athletes in Stop-Jump Tasks
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2002; 30(2): 261 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.