HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gross, M. L. Articles by Evanski, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Gross, M. L. Articles by Evanski, P. M.

Effectiveness of orthotic shoe inserts in the long-distance runner

Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Associates, Emerson, New Jersey

Lance B. Davlin, MD

Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Associates, Emerson, New Jersey

Philip M. Evanski, MD

Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Associates, Emerson, New Jersey

Five hundred questionnaires were distributed to long- distance runners who had used, or who were using orthotic shoe inserts for symptomatic relief of lower extremity complaints. Three hundred forty-seven (69.4%) responded (males, 71%; females, 29%). The mean age of the respondents was 36 years (range, 15 to 61). The average distance run per week was 39.6 miles (range, 5 to 98). The mean duration for use of the orthotic inserts was 23 months (range, 1 to 96). The predominant (63%) type of orthotic device used was flexible. The presumed diagnoses in the population studied were excessive pronation (31.1 %), leg length discrepancy (13.5%), patellofemoral disorders (12.6%), plantar fasciitis (20.7%), Achilles tendinitis (18.5%), shin splints (7.2%), and miscellaneous (4.9%).

Of the runners responding, 262 (75.5%) reported complete resolution or great improvement of their symptoms. Results of treatment with orthotic shoe inserts were independent of the diagnosis or the run ner's level of participation. A high degree of overall satisfaction was demonstrated by the finding that 90% of the runners continued to use the orthotic devices even after resolution of their symptoms. Orthotic shoe inserts were most effective in the treatment of symp toms arising from biomechanical abnormalities, such as excessive pronation or leg length discrepancy. Along with other conservative measures, orthotic shoe inserts may allow the athlete to continue participation in run ning and avoid other treatment modalities that are more costly and time consuming, and therefore less accept able to them.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. H. Richie Jr. Effects of Foot Orthoses on Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, January 1, 2007; 97(1): 19 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Landorf, A.-M. Keenan, and R. D. Herbert Effectiveness of Different Types of Foot Orthoses for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, November 1, 2004; 94(6): 542 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Maffulli, P. Sharma, and K. L Luscombe Achilles tendinopathy: aetiology and management J R Soc Med, October 1, 2004; 97(10): 472 - 476. [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. G Sutlive, S. D Mitchell, S. N Maxfield, C. L McLean, J. C Neumann, C. R Swiecki, R. C Hall, A. C Bare, and T. W Flynn Identification of Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain Whose Symptoms Improved After a Combined Program of Foot Orthosis Use and Modified Activity: A Preliminary Investigation Physical Therapy, January 1, 2004; 84(1): 49 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. A. Schepsis, H. Jones, and A. L. Haas Achilles Tendon Disorders in Athletes Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2002; 30(2): 287 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]