AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Speer, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Garrett, W. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Speer, K. P.
Right arrow Articles by Garrett, W. E., JR
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 19:396-402 (1991)
© 1991 SAGE Publications

Magnetic resonance imaging of traumatic knee articular cartilage injuries

Kevin P. Speer, MD

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery

Charles E. Spritzer, MD

Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina

J. Leonard Goldner, MD

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery

William E. Garrett, JR, MD, PhD

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Division of Orthopaedic Surgery

The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the pres ence of articular cartilage injuries of the knee with arthroscopy as the standard for comparison. Forty-nine articular cartilage lesions were documented in 28 knees (27 patients) by arthroscopy. There were 22 men and 5 women with an average age of 29 years. Multiplanar magnetic resonance imaging was performed with spin echo and gradient-refocused acquisition in a steady state pulse technique. All of the knees had magnetic resonance imaging done within 4 weeks prior to ar throscopy. The magnetic resonance images were inter preted before arthroscopy and interpreted again after the results of arthroscopy were known to better define the potential learning curve for evaluating chondral lesions and to identify the technical limits of the existing imaging protocol/software. For full-thickness articular cartilage lesions, the prearthroscopy sensitivity of mag netic resonance imaging was 41% (12/29) and the postarthroscopy sensitivity was 83% (24/29). For par tial-thickness chondral injury, the prearthroscopy sen sitivity of magnetic resonance imaging was 15% (3/20) and the postarthroscopy sensitivity was 55% (11/20). The presence of an intraarticular effusion assisted the detection of chondral lesions because of an "arthro gram" effect. As a noninvasive method of evaluating articular cartilage and despite experienced interpreta tion and the benefit of retrospective analysis, both the prearthroscopy and the postarthroscopy sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging was low using the imaging parameters described. Injury to articular cartilage is a frequent cause of knee pain and knee surgery; it is important to note at this time that magnetic resonance imaging cannot reliably exclude the presence of an articular cartilage injury.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
H. G. Potter and L. F. Foo
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage: Trauma, Degeneration, and Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2006; 34(4): 661 - 677.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
J. L. Jackson, P. G. O'Malley, and K. Kroenke
Evaluation of Acute Knee Pain in Primary Care
Ann Intern Med, October 7, 2003; 139(7): 575 - 588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. A. Rubin, C. D. Harner, and J. M. Costello
Treatable Chondral Injuries in the Knee: Frequency of Associated Focal Subchondral Edema
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2000; 174(4): 1099 - 1106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. Thein and M. Eichenblat
Concealed Knee Cartilage Lesions: Is Arthroscopic Probing Therapeutic?
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1999; 27(4): 495 - 499.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
H. G. POTTER, J. M. LINKLATER, A. A. ALLEN, J. A. HANNAFIN, and S. B. HAAS
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Articular Cartilage in the Knee. An Evaluation with Use of Fast-Spin-Echo Imaging
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 1, 1998; 80(9): 1276 - 1284.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J Hand Surg Eur VolHome page
T. LINDAU, M. ARNER, and L. HAGBERG
Intraarticular Lesions in Distal Fractures of the Radius in Young Adults: A descriptive arthroscopic study in 50 patients
J Hand Surg Eur Vol., October 1, 1997; 22(5): 638 - 643.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. Adalberth, H. Roos, M. Lauren, P. Akeson, M. Sloth, K. Jonsson, A. Lindstrand, and L. S. Lohmander
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Scintigraphy, and Arthroscopic Evaluation of Traumatic Hemarthrosis of the Knee
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1997; 25(2): 231 - 237.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. S. Levy, J. Lohnes, S. Sculley, M. LeCroy, and W. Garrett
Chondral Delamination of the Knee in Soccer Players
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1996; 24(5): 634 - 639.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. P. Speer, C. E. Spritzer, F. H. Bassett III, J. A. Feagin JR, and W. E. Garrett JR
Osseous injury associated with acute tears of the anterior cruciate ligament
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1992; 20(4): 382 - 389.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
E. Wouters, F. H. Bassett, W. T. Hardaker JR, and W. E. Garrett JR
An algorithm for arthroscopy in the over-50 age group
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1992; 20(2): 141 - 145.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.