AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drez, D.
Right arrow Articles by Young, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Drez, D., JR
Right arrow Articles by Young, J. C.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 19:381-383 (1991)
© 1991 SAGE Publications

In vivo measurement of anterior tibial translation using continuous passive motion devices

David Drez, JR, MD

Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana

Russell M. Paine, PT

Rehabilitation Services of Lake Charles

David C. Neuschwander, MD

Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana

John C. Young, PhD

McNeese State University, Lake Charles, Louisiana

Early motion protocols following anterior cruciate re construction often use continuous passive motion de vices. There is concern that these devices may induce undesired anterior translation of the tibia and resulting graft stretching or rupture. This study measured the amount of anterior tibial translation that occurred during one cycle in 10 different brands of continuous passive motion devices. Five patients with ACL deficient knees participated in this study. Anterior translation was re corded by using an electrogoniometer with four degrees of freedom (Knee Signature System).

Anterior translation measurements were also re corded for a 20 pound Lachman test in these same five patients using the Knee Signature System. Two of the devices showed anterior translation measurements that approached the recorded 20 pound Lachman values. These two devices had a high calf bar for the primary support of the leg. The results indicate that, when using a continuous passive motion device for early postop erative management of the reconstructed ACL in a patient, use of a calf-supporting type of continuous passive motion could induce an undesired strain of the healing graft.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.