AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paulos, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by France, E. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Paulos, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by France, E. P.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 19:337-342 (1991)
© 1991 SAGE Publications

Impact biomechanics of lateral knee bracing

The anterior cruciate ligament

Lonnie E. Paulos, MD

Salt Lake Knee and Sports Medicine

Patrick W. Cawley, OPA, RT

DonJoy Biomechanics Research Laboratory, Carlsbad, California

E. Paul France, PhD

Orthopedic Biomechanics Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah

We evaluated the effects of six different prophylactic braces on ACL ligament strain under dynamic valgus loads using a mechanical surrogate limb validated against human cadaveric specimens. Medial collateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament peak forces, medial collateral ligament and anterior cruciate ligament tension initiation times, and impact safety factors were calculated for both braced and unbraced conditions. These tests were conducted to determine whether or not application of a prophylactic brace might provide protection to the anterior cruciate ligament under valgus loading conditions.

The results of this study indicate that those braces that increased impact duration appear to differentially protect the anterior cruciate ligament more than the medial collateral ligament, and that most of the braces tested appear to provide some degree of protection to the anterior cruciate ligament under direct lateral im pacts. These findings should be confirmed clinically.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
L. Abernethy and C. Bleakley
Strategies to prevent injury in adolescent sport: a systematic review
Br. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2007; 41(10): 627 - 638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. Najibi and J. P. Albright
The Use of Knee Braces, Part 1: Prophylactic Knee Braces in Contact Sports
Am. J. Sports Med., April 1, 2005; 33(4): 602 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. K.H. Wu, G. Y.F. Ng, and A. F.T. Mak
Effects of Knee Bracing on the Sensorimotor Function of Subjects with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2001; 29(5): 641 - 645.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. L. Greene, K. R. Hamson, R. C. Bay, and C. D. Bryce
Effects of Protective Knee Bracing on Speed and Agility
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2000; 28(4): 453 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. F. LaPrade and Q. M. Burnett II
Femoral Intercondylar Notch Stenosis and Correlation to Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Prospective Study
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1994; 22(2): 198 - 203.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.