AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Daniel, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Daniel, D. M.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 19:139-147 (1991)
© 1991 SAGE Publications

Assessing the limits of knee motion

Dale M. Daniel, MD

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kaiser Hospital, San Diego, California

Ten patients were examined clinically by 11 experi enced knee surgeons and with three measurement devices (Genucom, Knee Signature System, and KT- 1000). Nine of the 10 patients examined had sustained documented intraarticular ligament disruptions includ ing eight ACL disruptions and five posterior cruciate ligament disruptions. The eight patients with ACL inju ries had undergone reconstructive surgery. The clinical examination test sequence was performed as de scribed by the International Knee Documentation Com mittee. Testing results were reported as estimated degrees of angulation or millimeters of displacement. Testing results were divided into two groups based on the index minus nonindex knee difference. Eighteen displacement tests were performed on each knee by each examiner. The index minus nonindex knee differ ence was greater than 3 mm in 16% of the tests. Only 1 of the 198 displacement tests performed on the subject who did not have a ligament disruption was recorded as an index minus nonindex difference greater than 3 mm. There was appreciable difference between measurements recorded by different examiners, partic ularly anterior/posterior measurements in patients who had sustained combined anterior and posterior cruciate ligament injuries. There is a need to rigorously evaluate limits of motion tests that are used to develop treatment plans and report the results of ligament surgery.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
D. H. Solomon, D. L. Simel, D. W. Bates, J. N. Katz, and J. L. Schaffer
Does This Patient Have a Torn Meniscus or Ligament of the Knee?: Value of the Physical Examination
JAMA, October 3, 2001; 286(13): 1610 - 1620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. J. Irrgang, A. F. Anderson, A. L. Boland, C. D. Harner, M. Kurosaka, P. Neyret, J. C. Richmond, and K. D. Shelborne
Development and Validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2001; 29(5): 600 - 613.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. M. Howell, M. P. Wallace, M. L. Hull, and M. L. Deutsch
Evaluation of the Single-Incision Arthroscopic Technique for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Replacement: A Study of Tibial Tunnel Placement, Intraoperative Graft Tension, and Stability
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 1999; 27(3): 284 - 293.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. L. Eakin and W. D. Cannon Jr
Arthrometric Evaluation of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1998; 26(1): 96 - 102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. E. Huber, J. J. Irrgang, C. Harner, and S. Lephart
Intratester and Intertester Reliability of the KT-1000 Arthrometer in the Assessment of Posterior Laxity of the Knee
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1997; 25(4): 479 - 485.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
L. C. S. M. HOWELL and C. M. A. TAYLOR
Brace-Free Rehabilitation, with Early Return to Activity, for Knees Reconstructed with a Double-Looped Semitendinosus and Gracilis Graft*{{dagger}}
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 1996; 78(6): 814 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. W. Myrer, S. S. Schulthies, and G. W. Fellingham
Relative and Absolute Reliability of the KT-2000 Arthrometer for Uninjured Knees: Testing at 67, 89, 134, and 178 N and Manual Maximum Forces
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1996; 24(1): 104 - 108.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. A. Rubinstein JR, K. D. Shelbourne, J. R. McCarroll, C. D. VanMeter, and A. C. Rettig
The Accuracy of the Clinical Examination in the Setting of Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1994; 22(4): 550 - 557.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. G. Lane, S. E. Irby, K. Kaufman, C. Rangger, and D. M. Daniel
The Anterior Cruciate Ligament in Controlling Axial Rotation: An Evaluation of Its Effect
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1994; 22(2): 289 - 293.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.