AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woods, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Prevot, T. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Woods, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Prevot, T. J.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 19:48-55 (1991)
© 1991 SAGE Publications

The Gore-Tex anterior cruciate ligament prosthesis

Two versus three year results

Gregory A. Woods, MD

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Peter A. Indelicato, MD

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Troy J. Prevot, PAC, ATC

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

A prospective clinical study of the results of prosthetic ligament replacement of the ACL with the Gore-Tex polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis was undertaken. Thirty-three (80%) of 41 patients were available at a minimum 36 month followup (mean, 48 months; range, 36 to 62). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed an 82% probability of survival of the polytetrafluoroethyl ene ligament at the 48 month followup. When compared to the same data at a minimum 24 month followup, the results appeared to have deterioriated somewhat over time. Three possible "predictors" of failure at later fol lowup were identified: preoperative subjective symp toms of swelling, subjective symptoms of giving way at 2 years, and an increased anterior drawer sign at 2 years.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. S. George, W. R. Dunn, and K. P. Spindler
Current Concepts Review: Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2006; 34(12): 2026 - 2037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. B. FRANK and D. W. JACKSON
Current Concepts Review - The Science of Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., October 1, 1997; 79(10): 1556 - 76.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
N. L. Harris, D. A. B. Smith, L. Lamoreaux, and M. Purnell
Central Quadriceps Tendon for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part I: Morphometric and Biomechanical Evaluation
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1997; 25(1): 23 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. K. Graf, J. Henry, M. Rothenberg, and R. Vanderby
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Patellar Tendon: An Ex Vivo Study of Wear-related Damage and Failure at the Femoral Tunnel
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1994; 22(1): 131 - 135.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. M. Wilk and J. C. Richmond
Dacron ligament reconstruction for chronic anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1993; 21(3): 374 - 380.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.