AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kibler, W.B.
Right arrow Articles by Maddux, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kibler, W.B.
Right arrow Articles by Maddux, R. E.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 17:525-531 (1989)
© 1989 SAGE Publications

A musculoskeletal approach to the preparticipation physical examination

Preventing injury and improving performance

W.B. Kibler, MD

Lexington Clinic Sports Medicine Center, Lexington, Kentucky

T. Jeff Chandler, EdD

Lexington Clinic Sports Medicine Center, Lexington, Kentucky

Tim Uhl, PT, ATC

Lexington Clinic Sports Medicine Center, Lexington, Kentucky

Robin E. Maddux, MS, PT

Lexington Clinic Sports Medicine Center, Lexington, Kentucky

Preparticipation physical examinations provide infor mation concerning an athlete's ability to participate safely in sports. By collecting information specific to the musculoskeletal system in addition to that from a general medical examination, information can be gained that may improve performance and help prevent certain injuries. Two thousand one hundred seven athletes from a variety of sports from the junior high to the college level were examined using specific tests for flexibility, strength, and endurance. Females were sig nificantly more flexible than were males on all flexibility measurements, and males were significantly stronger than were females on all strength measurements. Up per-body athletes were tighter in dominant side internal rotation and significantly looser in dominant side exter nal rotation. Lower-body athletes, especially females, were significantly tighter in the leg muscles. These results indicate that the adaptations of the musculo skeletal system are sport specific and depend on the body area that is placed under stress.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
P. J Carek and A. Mainous III
The preparticipation physical examination for athletics: a systematic review of current recommendations
BMJ, October 6, 2003; 327(7418): E170 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
W. B. Kibler, C. Goldberg, and T. J. Chandler
Functional biomechanical deficits in running athletes with plantar fasciitis
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1991; 19(1): 66 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.