AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hefzy, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Noyes, F. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hefzy, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Noyes, F. R.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 17:208-216 (1989)
© 1989 SAGE Publications

Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments

Part II: The anterior cruciate ligament

Mohamed S. Hefzy, PhD

Noyes-Giannestras Biomechanics Laboratories, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Cincinnati

Edward S. Grood, PhD

Noyes-Giannestras Biomechanics Laboratories, Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, University of Cincinnati

Frank R. Noyes, MD

Cincinnati Sportsmedicine Center, The Deaconess Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio

During flexion of the intact knee, we measured the changes in distance between possible tibial and femoral attachments of an intraarticular ACL substitute. The change in distance during motion was described by the difference between the longest and shortest distances measured. Using knees from eight cadaver donors, we studied the effects of varying tibial and femoral attach ment locations, applying anterior and posterior forces, and altering the range of flexion.

We found that altering the femoral attachment had a much larger effect than had altering the tibial attach ment. No femoral attachments were completely iso metric. Femoral attachments that produced the small est change in tibiofemoral distance, 2 mm and less, formed a band whose greatest width ranged from 3 to 5 mm. The axis of the 2 mm region was nearly proximal- distal in orientation and located near the center of the ACL's femoral insertion. Attachments located anterior to the axis moved away from the tibial attachment with flexion, whereas attachments located posterior to the axis moved toward the tibia.

The AP position of the tibial attachment affected the orientation of the 2 mm region. Moving the tibial attach ment posteriorly caused the proximal part of the region to move anterior, with little change in the location of the distal part of the region. Changing the applied joint force from anterior to posterior was similar to moving the tibial attachment posteriorly, but the effect was less pronounced. Increasing the range of flexion from 90° to 120° caused the 2 mm region to become narrower and changed its orientation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. E. Steiner, M. M. Murray, and S. A. Rodeo
Strategies to Improve Anterior Cruciate Ligament Healing and Graft Placement
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2008; 36(1): 176 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. Mauch, G. Apic, U. Becker, and G. Bauer
Differences in the Placement of the Tibial Tunnel During Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament With and Without Computer-Assisted Navigation
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2007; 35(11): 1824 - 1832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. S. George, W. R. Dunn, and K. P. Spindler
Current Concepts Review: Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 2006; 34(12): 2026 - 2037.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
D. J. Deehan and T. E. Cawston
The biology of integration of the anterior cruciate ligament
J Bone Joint Surg Br, July 1, 2005; 87-B(7): 889 - 895.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
V. Musahl, A. Plakseychuk, A. VanScyoc, T. Sasaki, R. E. Debski, P. J. McMahon, and F. H. Fu
Varying Femoral Tunnels Between the Anatomical Footprint and Isometric Positions: Effect on Kinematics of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 2005; 33(5): 712 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. P. Arnold, N. Verdonschot, and A. van Kampen
The Normal Anterior Cruciate Ligament as a Model for Tensioning Strategies in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts
Am. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2005; 33(2): 277 - 283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. Jagodzinski, V. Behfar, C. Hurschler, K. Albrecht, C. Krettek, and U. Bosch
Femoral Press-Fit Fixation of the Hamstring Tendons for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., October 1, 2004; 32(7): 1723 - 1730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
A. D. Armstrong, L. M. Ferreira, C. E. Dunning, J. A. Johnson, and G. J. W. King
The Medial Collateral Ligament of the Elbow Is Not Isometric: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2004; 32(1): 85 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
V. Guzzanti, F. Falciglia, and C. L. Stanitski
Preoperative Evaluation and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique for Skeletally Immature Patients in Tanner Stages 2 and 3
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2003; 31(6): 941 - 948.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. S. Ahmad, Z. A. Cohen, W. N. Levine, T. R. Gardner, G. A. Ateshian, and V. C. Mow
Codominance of the Individual Posterior Cruciate Ligament Bundles: An Analysis of Bundle Lengths and Orientation
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2003; 31(2): 221 - 225.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
B. S. Delay, B. E. McGrath, and E. R. Mindell
Observations on a Retrieved Patellar Tendon Autograft Used to Reconstruct the Anterior Cruciate Ligament : A Case Report
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., September 9, 2002; 84(8): 1433 - 1438.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. A. Pinczewski, D. J. Deehan, L. J. Salmon, V. J. Russell, and A. Clingeleffer
A Five-Year Comparison of Patellar Tendon Versus Four-Strand Hamstring Tendon Autograft for Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2002; 30(4): 523 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. Jassem, A. T. Rose, K. Meister, P. A. Indelicato, and D. Wheeler
Biomechanical Analysis of the Effect of Varying Suture Pitch in Tendon Graft Fixation: Varying Suture Pitch in Tendon Graft Fixation
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2001; 29(6): 734 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
F. R. Noyes and S. D. Barber-Westin
Revision Anterior Cruciate Surgery with Use of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autogenous Grafts
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2001; 83(8): 1131 - 1143.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
Y. Ishibashi, S. Toh, Y. Okamura, T. Sasaki, and T. Kusumi
Graft Incorporation within the Tibial Bone Tunnel after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 2001; 29(4): 473 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. D. Beynnon, B. S. Uh, R. J. Johnson, B. C. Fleming, P. A. Renstrom, and C. E. Nichols
The Elongation Behavior of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft In Vivo: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2001; 29(2): 161 - 166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. P. Musgrove, L. J. Salmon, C. F. Burt, and L. A. Pinczewski
The Influence of Reverse-Thread Screw Femoral Fixation on Laxity Measurements After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2000; 28(5): 695 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. H. Fu, C. H. Bennett, C. B. Ma, J. Menetrey, and C. Lattermann
Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part II. Operative Procedures and Clinical Correlations
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2000; 28(1): 124 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
F. H. Fu, C. H. Bennett, C. Lattermann, and C. B. Ma
Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Part 1: Biology and Biomechanics of Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 1999; 27(6): 821 - 830.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. F. Draganich, Y.-F. Hsieh, S. Ho, and B. Reider
Intraarticular Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Placement on the Average Most Isometric Line on the Femur: Does It Reproducibly Restore Knee Kinematics?
Am. J. Sports Med., May 1, 1999; 27(3): 329 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
J. P. Furia, D. M. Lintner, P. Saiz, H. W. Kohl, and P. Noble
Isometry Measurements in the Knee With the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Intact, Sectioned, and Reconstructed
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1997; 25(3): 346 - 352.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. Yasuda, J. Tsujino, Y. Tanabe, and K. Kaneda
Effects of Initial Graft Tension on Clinical Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Autogenous Doubled Hamstring Tendons Connected in Series with Polyester Tapes
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1997; 25(1): 99 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
P. Aglietti, R. Buzzi, P. P. M. Menchetti, and F. Giron
Arthroscopically Assisted Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Graft in Reconstruction for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries in Athletes
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1996; 24(6): 726 - 731.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
E. E. Khalfayan, P. F. Sharkey, A. H. Alexander, J. D. Bruckner, and E. B. Bynum
The Relationship Between Tunnel Placement and Clinical Results After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1996; 24(3): 335 - 341.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. F. Draganich, Y.-F. Hsieh, and B. Reider
Strategies for Attachment Site Locations and Twist of the Intraarticular Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1996; 24(3): 342 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. M. Lintner, S. E. Dewitt, and J. B. Moseley
Radiographic Evaluation of Native Anterior Cruciate Ligament Attachments and Graft Placement for Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1996; 24(1): 72 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
E. D. Nabors, J. C. Richmond, W. M. Vannah, and O. R. McConville
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Tensioning in Full Extension
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1995; 23(4): 488 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. F. Blum, W. P. Garth JR., and J. E. Lemons
The Effects of Graft Rotation on Attachment Site Separation Distances in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1995; 23(3): 282 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. Good, M. Odensten, and J. Gillquist
Sagittal Knee Stability After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with a Patellar Tendon Strip: A Two-year Follow-up Study
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1994; 22(4): 518 - 523.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. R. Colville and R. R. Bowman
The significance of isometer measurements and graft position during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1993; 21(6): 832 - 835.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. H. Brown JR, A. T. Hecker, J. A. Hipp, E. R. Myers, and W. C. Hayes
The biomechanics of interference screw fixation of patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament grafts
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1993; 21(6): 880 - 886.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. E. Fisher and K. D. Shelbourne
Arthroscopic treatment of symptomatic extension block complicating anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1993; 21(4): 558 - 564.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
V. M. Romano, B. K. Graf, J. S. Keene, and R. H. Lange
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: The effect of tibial tunnel placement on range of motion
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1993; 21(3): 415 - 418.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. Muneta, H. Yamamoto, H. Sakai, T. Ishibashi, and K. Furuya
Relationship between changes in length and force in in vitro reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1993; 21(2): 299 - 304.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. Fleming, B. D. Beynnon, R. J. Johnson, W. D. McLeod, and M. H. Pope
Isometric versus tension measurements
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1993; 21(1): 82 - 88.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
R. A. Marder, J. R. Raskind, and M. Carroll
Prospective evaluation of arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendons
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1991; 19(5): 478 - 484.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
H. Kurosawa, K. Yasuda, K.-I. Yamakoshi, A. Kamiya, and K. Kaneda
An experimental evaluation of isometric placement for extraarticular reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1991; 19(4): 384 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. M. Howell, J. A. Clark, and T. E. Farley
A rationale for predicting anterior cruciate graft impingement by the intercondylar roof: A magnetic resonance imaging study
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1991; 19(3): 276 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.