AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newman, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Dales, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Newman, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Dales, M. C.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 17:164-175 (1989)
© 1989 SAGE Publications

Mechanics of the healed meniscus in a canine model

Alan P. Newman, MD

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah

D. Ron Anderson, MD

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine

A.U. Daniels, PhD

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Veterans Administration Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah

Mark C. Dales, MD

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine

The mechanical behavior of the intact canine stifle joint was studied, using a surgical model of meniscal injury and repair. Thirty-eight animals were divided into five study groups: Group S received only a sham arthro tomy (without a meniscal incision), Groups P13 and P26 received peripheral medial meniscal incisions, and Groups R13 and R26 received radial medial meniscus incisions. All meniscal incisions were repaired anatom ically with absorbable suture. Groups P13 and R13 were sacrificed at 13 weeks following surgery and Groups P26 and R26 at 26 weeks. Following sacrifice, the joints were subjected to gross and histologic ex amination, and structural and material properties test ing.

All meniscal repairs healed, and the peripheral repairs were virtually invisible, with no articular damage. The radial repairs healed with 3 to 5 mm wide fibrovascular scars, and several joints demonstrated articular ero sions. The radial repair tissue contained unorganized collagen bundles and ground substance deficient in mucopolysaccharides.

Groups S, P13 and P26 demonstrated no statistically significant differences between test and control limbs in compressive force-displacement behavior, input en ergy (EI), and ratio of dissipated to input energy (ED/EI). There were significant test-control differences in the load-displacement characteristics of Groups R13 (P < 0.05) and R26 (P < 0.05), with the repaired joint stiffer than the control. El decreased 26% in Group R13 (not significant) and 34% in Group R26 (P < 0.05), while the ratio ED/El increased from 27% to 44% in Group R13 (not significant) and from 31 % to 38% in Group R26 (P < 0.05).

Medial compartment contact area did not change significantly in either peripheral repair group, but de creased by 25% in Group R13 (P < 0.05) and by 13% in Group R26 (P< 0.05). Yield stress, maximum stress, and Young's modulus decreased significantly (P < 0.05) relative to the controls in tensile tests of the radial repair tissue. There were no significant changes in these properties from 13 to 26 weeks.

We concluded that in this animal model, the mechan ical function of the meniscus is restored following repair of peripheral longitudinal lesions ; however, it appears that in the radial repairs, progressive spreading at the repair site (filled by a fibrovascular scar) altered normal meniscal geometry and structure, adversely influencing mechanical function. Future studies may document whether protective measures (immobilization, limited weightbearing, etc.) can preserve normal mechanical function following repair of radial lesions.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
I. Voloshin, M. A. Schmitz, M. J. Adams, and K. E. DeHaven
Results of Repeat Meniscal Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., November 1, 2003; 31(6): 874 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. Sonoda, F. L. Harwood, M. E. Amiel, H. Moriya, M. Temple, D. G. Chang, L. M. Lottman, R. L. Sah, and D. Amiel
The Effects of Hyaluronan on Tissue Healing After Meniscus Injury and Repair in a Rabbit Model
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2000; 28(1): 90 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. E. DeHaven
Meniscus Repair
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1999; 27(2): 242 - 250.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. A. Paletta Jr, T. Manning, E. Snell, R. Parker, and J. Bergfeld
The Effect of Allograft Meniscal Replacement on Intraarticular Contact Area and Pressures in the Human Knee: A Biomechanical Study
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1997; 25(5): 692 - 698.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
G. C.R. Keene, D. Bickerstaff, P. J. Rae, and R. S. Paterson
The natural history of meniscal tears in anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1993; 21(5): 672 - 679.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. Sommerlath and J. Gillquist
The effect of a meniscal prosthesis on knee biomechanics and cartilage: An experimental study in rabbits
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1992; 20(1): 73 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.