AJSM Click here for details!
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orava, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hulkko, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Orava, S.
Right arrow Articles by Hulkko, A.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 16:378-382 (1988)
© 1988 SAGE Publications

Delayed unions and nonunions of stress fractures in athletes

S. Orava

Department of Sports Medicine, Deaconess Institute and University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

A. Hulkko, MD

Department of Surgery, Keski-Pohjanmaa Central Hospital and Sports Injury Clinic Medirex, Kokkola, Finland

From 1971 to 1985, 369 athletes presented to us with stress fractures. Of these patients, 10% (37) were treated for development of delayed unions or non unions. Twenty-seven of the patients were male and 10 were female. Their mean age was 23.1 years (range, 17 to 39). About half of the athletes were involved in endurance sports. The diagnostic criteria for a delayed union or nonunion were clinical and radiological evi dence. There was a diagnostic delay of about 3.5 months in the series. Plain radiographs, tomography, and isotope scans were used in the diagnosis. Special radiographic views were also used. In 15 cases (10 hallux sesamoid bone fractures, 1 midtibial shaft frac ture, 1 metatarsal V base fracture, 1 tarsal navicular fracture, 1 olecranon fracture, and 1 proximal tibial shaft fracture) nonoperative treatment was used. Operative treatment was used 22 times (5 sesamoid fractures, 5 midtibial fractures, 5 metatarsal V base fractures, 3 tarsal navicular fractures, 3 olecranon fractures, and 1 proximal tibial shaft fracture). Results were good or excellent in 32 cases (86.5%), moderate in 4 cases, and poor in 1 case.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. T. Shearer and M. J. Penner
Stress Fractures of the Base of the Fourth Metatarsal: 2 Cases and a Review of the Literature
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 2007; 35(3): 479 - 483.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
L. Muscolo, A. Migues, G. Slullitel, and M. Costa-Paz
Stress Fracture Nonunion at the Base of the Second Metatarsal in a Ballet Dancer: A Case Report
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2004; 32(6): 1535 - 1537.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
J. Riley and M. Selner
Internal Fixation of a Displaced Tibial Sesamoid Fracture
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, November 1, 2001; 91(10): 536 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Sports. Med.Home page
P S Rao, S K Rao, and B C Navadgi
Olecranon stress fracture in a weight lifter: a case report
Br. J. Sports Med., February 1, 2001; 35(1): 72 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. M. Khan, P. J. Fuller, P. D. Brukner, C. Kearney, and H. C. Burry
Outcome of conservative and surgical management of navicular stress fracture in athletes: Eighty-six cases proven with computerized tomography
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1992; 20(6): 657 - 666.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. Pecina, I. Bojanic, and S. Dubravcic
Stress fractures in figure skaters
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1990; 18(3): 277 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.