|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Inglewood, California
Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Inglewood, California
Eleven patients, 2 years after ACL reconstruction with a patellar tendon graft, returned for follow-up testing consisting of: 1) subjective assessment and functional analysis, 2) objective examination for residual ligamen tous instability, 3) isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength assessment, 4) radiographic assessment, 5) instrumented measurement of anterior shear displace ment via a knee arthrometer, and 6) force plate and film analysis while performing cutting maneuvers in a laboratory setting. All 11 patients had been tested preoperatively through all steps except the fifth. The group subjectively rated the postoperative knee as 83% of the preinjury status, an increase from a 53% mean prior to reconstruction. Six of 11 patients were able to return to their full preinjury level of competition, with or without a brace. Four patients had positive drawer tests, five had positive Lachman examinations, and all subjects had negative pivot shifts. Significant quadri ceps torque deficits remained (P < 0.0005), with the postoperative knee extensors approximately 85% of the contralateral limb. The involved limb hamstrings were equal in strength to the nonoperated limb. Radio graphic evaluation revealed four, five, and four patients with positive findings of the patellofemoral joint, medial joint space, and lateral joint space, respectively. Only one patient had normal radiographs. Instrumented knee laxity testing revealed the operated knee to be signifi cantly looser only during maximum passive displace ment (7.2 mm versus 5.3 mm, P < 0.01) and not during the other measurements. Biomechanical analysis of the straight cut maneuver revealed no significant differ ences between the nonoperated and operated limbs at the 2 year postoperative mark. Values for the cross cut were now similar between limbs, abolishing the deficit that had existed preoperatively.
This study confirms, in a laboratory setting, that a patellar tendon reconstruction of the ACL can improve the functional status of the knee and enhance athletic performance.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. D. Shelbourne and B. C. Johnson Effects of Patellar Tendon Width and Preoperative Quadriceps Strength on Strength Return After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Ipsilateral Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2004; 32(6): 1474 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Bush-Joseph, D. E. Hurwitz, R. R. Patel, Y. Bahrani, R. Garretson, B. R. Bach Jr., and T. P. Andriacchi Dynamic Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Autologous Patellar Tendon Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2001; 29(1): 36 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Wilson, M. P. Zafuta, and M. Zobitz A Biomechanical Analysis of Matched Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Double-Looped Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Grafts Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1999; 27(2): 202 - 207. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Ahmad, S. D. Kwak, G. A. Ateshian, W. H. Warden, J. R. Steadman, and V. C. Mow Effects of Patellar Tendon Adhesion to the Anterior Tibia on Knee Mechanics Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1998; 26(5): 715 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. PROCTOR, D. W. JACKSON, and T. M. SIMON Characterization of the Repair Tissue after Removal of the Central One-Third of the Patellar Ligament. An Experimental Study in a Goat Model J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 1997; 79(7): 997 - 1006. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Johnson, D. B. Either, and W. J. Vanarthos Herniation of the Patellar Fat Pad Through the Patellar Tendon Defect After Autologous Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Report Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1996; 24(2): 201 - 204. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yasuda, J. Tsujino, Y. Ohkoshi, Y. Tanabe, and K. Kaneda Graft Site Morbidity with Autogenous Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendons Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1995; 23(6): 706 - 714. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. D. Beynnon, D. Proffer, D. J. Drez Jr., C. J. Stankewich, and R. J. Johnson Biomechanical Assessment of the Healing Response of the Rabbit Patellar Tendon After Removal of Its Central Third Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1995; 23(4): 452 - 457. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Maitland, R. Lowe, S. Stewart, T. Fung, and G. D. Bell Does Cybex testing increase knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions? Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1993; 21(5): 690 - 695. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Lephart, M. S. Kocher, C. D. Harner, and F. H. Fu Quadriceps strength and functional capacity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Patellar tendon autograft versus allograft Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1993; 21(5): 738 - 743. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Shaffer and J. E. Tibone Patellar tendon length change after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the midthird patellar tendon Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1993; 21(3): 449 - 454. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Yasuda, Y. Ohkoshi, Y. Tanabe, and K. Kaneda Quantitative evaluation of knee instability and muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar and quadriceps tendon Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1992; 20(4): 471 - 475. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Coupens, C. K. Yates, C. Sheldon, and C. Ward Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the patellar tendon after use of its central one-third for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1992; 20(3): 332 - 335. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |