AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tibone, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Antich, T.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tibone, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Antich, T.J.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 16:332-335 (1988)
© 1988 SAGE Publications

A biomechanical analysis of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the patellar tendon

A two year followup

James E. Tibone, MD

Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Inglewood, California

T.J. Antich, MS, RPT

Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Inglewood, California

Eleven patients, 2 years after ACL reconstruction with a patellar tendon graft, returned for follow-up testing consisting of: 1) subjective assessment and functional analysis, 2) objective examination for residual ligamen tous instability, 3) isokinetic quadriceps and hamstrings strength assessment, 4) radiographic assessment, 5) instrumented measurement of anterior shear displace ment via a knee arthrometer, and 6) force plate and film analysis while performing cutting maneuvers in a laboratory setting. All 11 patients had been tested preoperatively through all steps except the fifth. The group subjectively rated the postoperative knee as 83% of the preinjury status, an increase from a 53% mean prior to reconstruction. Six of 11 patients were able to return to their full preinjury level of competition, with or without a brace. Four patients had positive drawer tests, five had positive Lachman examinations, and all subjects had negative pivot shifts. Significant quadri ceps torque deficits remained (P < 0.0005), with the postoperative knee extensors approximately 85% of the contralateral limb. The involved limb hamstrings were equal in strength to the nonoperated limb. Radio graphic evaluation revealed four, five, and four patients with positive findings of the patellofemoral joint, medial joint space, and lateral joint space, respectively. Only one patient had normal radiographs. Instrumented knee laxity testing revealed the operated knee to be signifi cantly looser only during maximum passive displace ment (7.2 mm versus 5.3 mm, P < 0.01) and not during the other measurements. Biomechanical analysis of the straight cut maneuver revealed no significant differ ences between the nonoperated and operated limbs at the 2 year postoperative mark. Values for the cross cut were now similar between limbs, abolishing the deficit that had existed preoperatively.

This study confirms, in a laboratory setting, that a patellar tendon reconstruction of the ACL can improve the functional status of the knee and enhance athletic performance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. D. Shelbourne and B. C. Johnson
Effects of Patellar Tendon Width and Preoperative Quadriceps Strength on Strength Return After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Ipsilateral Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Autograft
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 2004; 32(6): 1474 - 1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. A. Bush-Joseph, D. E. Hurwitz, R. R. Patel, Y. Bahrani, R. Garretson, B. R. Bach Jr., and T. P. Andriacchi
Dynamic Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Autologous Patellar Tendon
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2001; 29(1): 36 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
T. W. Wilson, M. P. Zafuta, and M. Zobitz
A Biomechanical Analysis of Matched Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Double-Looped Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendon Grafts
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1999; 27(2): 202 - 207.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
C. S. Ahmad, S. D. Kwak, G. A. Ateshian, W. H. Warden, J. R. Steadman, and V. C. Mow
Effects of Patellar Tendon Adhesion to the Anterior Tibia on Knee Mechanics
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1998; 26(5): 715 - 724.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
C. S. PROCTOR, D. W. JACKSON, and T. M. SIMON
Characterization of the Repair Tissue after Removal of the Central One-Third of the Patellar Ligament. An Experimental Study in a Goat Model
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., July 1, 1997; 79(7): 997 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
D. L. Johnson, D. B. Either, and W. J. Vanarthos
Herniation of the Patellar Fat Pad Through the Patellar Tendon Defect After Autologous Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Case Report
Am. J. Sports Med., March 1, 1996; 24(2): 201 - 204.
[PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. Yasuda, J. Tsujino, Y. Ohkoshi, Y. Tanabe, and K. Kaneda
Graft Site Morbidity with Autogenous Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendons
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1995; 23(6): 706 - 714.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. D. Beynnon, D. Proffer, D. J. Drez Jr., C. J. Stankewich, and R. J. Johnson
Biomechanical Assessment of the Healing Response of the Rabbit Patellar Tendon After Removal of Its Central Third
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1995; 23(4): 452 - 457.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. E. Maitland, R. Lowe, S. Stewart, T. Fung, and G. D. Bell
Does Cybex testing increase knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions?
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1993; 21(5): 690 - 695.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. M. Lephart, M. S. Kocher, C. D. Harner, and F. H. Fu
Quadriceps strength and functional capacity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Patellar tendon autograft versus allograft
Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1993; 21(5): 738 - 743.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
B. S. Shaffer and J. E. Tibone
Patellar tendon length change after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the midthird patellar tendon
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1993; 21(3): 449 - 454.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
K. Yasuda, Y. Ohkoshi, Y. Tanabe, and K. Kaneda
Quantitative evaluation of knee instability and muscle strength after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar and quadriceps tendon
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1992; 20(4): 471 - 475.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
S. D. Coupens, C. K. Yates, C. Sheldon, and C. Ward
Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of the patellar tendon after use of its central one-third for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Am. J. Sports Med., June 1, 1992; 20(3): 332 - 335.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.