AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nigg, B.M.
Right arrow Articles by Read, L.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nigg, B.M.
Right arrow Articles by Read, L.J.
The American Journal of Sports Medicine 16:70-76 (1988)
© 1988 SAGE Publications

Effect of viscoelastic shoe insoles on vertical impact forces in heel-toe running

B.M. Nigg

Biomechanics Laboratory, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

W. Herzog, PhD

Biomechanics Laboratory, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

L.J. Read

Biomechanics Laboratory, The University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

The purposes of this study were: 1) to compare the impact forces in running using running shoes with con ventional insoles to the impact forces using running shoes with four different viscoelastic insoles, 2) to discuss possible effects of the viscoelastic insoles on lower leg kinematics, and 3) to explain the force and kinematic results using a mechanical model. Kinetic and kinematic data were collected for 14 subjects running heel-toe at an average speed of 4 m/s. The results showed that the four tested viscoelastic insoles did not differ in variables describing the vertical impact forces (vertical force peak, time of occurrence of vertical force peak, maximum vertical loading rate) compared to the conventional insoles furnished in running shoes. Fur thermore, the viscoelastic insoles did not influence ki nematic variables of the lower extremities in a system atic way.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
K. O'Leary, K. A. Vorpahl, and B. Heiderscheit
Effect of Cushioned Insoles on Impact Forces During Running
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, January 1, 2008; 98(1): 36 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
R. Withnall, J. Eastaugh, and N. Freemantle
Do shock absorbing insoles in recruits undertaking high levels of physical activity reduce lower limb injury? A randomized controlled trial
J R Soc Med, January 1, 2006; 99(1): 32 - 37.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. L. Gross, L. B. Davlin, and P. M. Evanski
Effectiveness of orthotic shoe inserts in the long-distance runner
Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1991; 19(4): 409 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
W. B. Kibler, C. Goldberg, and T. J. Chandler
Functional biomechanical deficits in running athletes with plantar fasciitis
Am. J. Sports Med., January 1, 1991; 19(1): 66 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am J Sports MedHome page
M. P. Schwellnus, G. Jordaan, and T. D. Noakes
Prevention of common overuse injuries by the use of shock absorbing insoles: A prospective study
Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1990; 18(6): 636 - 641.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.