|
|
||||||||
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
|||||||||
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Victoria Hospital, University of Western Ontario and the Orthopaedic Therapy Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Victoria Hospital, University of Western Ontario and the Orthopaedic Therapy Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Victoria Hospital, University of Western Ontario and the Orthopaedic Therapy Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Victoria Hospital, University of Western Ontario and the Orthopaedic Therapy Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Victoria Hospital, University of Western Ontario and the Orthopaedic Therapy Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
A retrospective study to determine the efficacy of me dial gastrocnemius tendon transfer for symptomatic PCL instability is presented. Results from a group of 31 patients undergoing this procedure were compared with a group of 8 patients managed conservatively while awaiting surgery.
The mean injury to follow-up interval was 82 months in the operated group and 104 months in the nonop erated group. The mean surgery to follow-up interval was 53 months. Sixty-nine percent of surgical patients were subjectively improved; however, 29 (91 %) contin ued to have pain and 19 (59%) continued to experience giving way. Thirteen patients from the operated group who had associated procedures performed were sig nificantly better subjectively than those with no asso ciated procedures (P < 0.05).
Physical examination demonstrated no difference in clinical laxity between the operated and nonoperated groups. Medial gastrocnemius transfer did not result in any significant reduction in anterior-posterior translation (KT-1000 assessment) when reconstructed knees were compared with control posterior cruciate deficient knees. Surgery, combined with subsequent immobili zation, may have also been responsible for the signifi cant reduction in lower limb function observed in the reconstructed patients.
We do not recommend this procedure as a primary PCL reconstruction.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. J. Ortiz, H. Schmotzer, J. Bernbeck, S. Graham, J. E. Tibone, and C. T. Vangsness Jr Isometry of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament: Effects of Functional Load and Muscle Force Application Am. J. Sports Med., September 1, 1998; 26(5): 663 - 668. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. C. Burns II, L. F. Draganich, M. Pyevich, and B. Reider The Effect of Femoral Tunnel Position and Graft Tensioning Technique on Posterior Laxity of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Reconstructed Knee Am. J. Sports Med., July 1, 1995; 23(4): 424 - 430. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. B. Geissler and T. L. Whipple Intraarticular abnormalities in association with posterior cruciate ligament injuries Am. J. Sports Med., December 1, 1993; 21(6): 846 - 849. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | CONTACT US | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |