AJSM signin
HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
First published on March 28, 2008
(American Journal of Sports Medicine 2008, doi:10.1177/0363546508315199)
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (AJSM PreView[PDF])
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Magit, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, T. Q.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Magit, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, T. Q.

Article

In Vivo Comparison of Changes in Glenohumeral Translation After Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Reconstructions

David P. Magit, MD1, James E. Tibone, MD1, Thay Q. Lee, PhD2*

1 Kerlan Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Los Angeles, California
2 Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, California

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: tqlee{at}med.va.gov.


   Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to quantify anteroposterior glenohumeral translation of patients undergoing arthroscopic capsulolabral repairs using cutaneous electromagnetic position sensors.

Hypothesis: Anteroposterior translation will be restored after arthroscopic capsulolabral repairs to values similar to the contralateral or uninjured shoulder.

Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.

Methods: With use of an electromagnetic tracking system, preoperative anteroposterior translation was measured in the injured and uninvolved shoulders of 32 patients with a diagnosis of glenohumeral labral tears. Testing was done with patients placed in the supine position with the arm suspended in 90° of abduction and neutral rotation. The American Shoulder and Elbow Society index and range of motion were also measured. Patients with capsulolabral injuries requiring arthroscopic repair were reexamined at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results: In patients with anteroinferior/posteroinferior capsulolabral repairs, glenohumeral translation at 3 and 6 months postoperative (P < .0001) was significantly decreased compared with preoperative values (P = .0007) and the uninvolved side (preoperative, P = .04; postoperative, P = .002). In patients with superior capsulolabral (superior labral anterior-posterior) repairs, the mean glenohumeral translation at 3 and 6 months postoperative was decreased significantly compared with the preoperative value; however, no significant differences were found between the uninvolved side (preoperative, P = .5) and the operative shoulder (postoperative, P = .2). By 6-month follow-up, no significant difference existed in external rotation when compared with preoperative values for either repair group.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic superior capsulolabral reconstructions successfully restored anteroposterior translation. However, arthroscopic capsulolabral techniques for treating recurrent anterior or posterior instability resulted in decreased anteroposterior translation compared to the uninvolved side while restoring external rotation.







HOME HELP CONTACT US SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2008 by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine.